|
It is 100% certain you're headed for Hell ...
for rejecting the Catholic Dogma ...
Warning: There are no bishops or priests in these times
1. The Original Sin of Adam closed Heaven for all men (sanctifying grace was lost) ... Hell became the only possible destination for the immortal souls of men.
7. One can still be Catholic and get to Heaven with a proper baptism in water
[Section 7] ... believing the Dogmas ... and keeping free from mortal sin. [Section 10.1]
E-mail > Slave_BVM@mail.com -- Catholic-Dogma-Providers@mail.com
<<< --- <<< --- <<< --- <<< --- Start Section 99 --- >>> --- >>> --- >>> --- >>>
Against the "supplied jurisdiction" ... non-Catholic fraud
"Supplied jurisdiction" is soul damning heresy ... it
"Supplied jurisdiction" is ... 100% against the
~ ~ ~
Introduction:
No building on earth with ... a Catholic sign ... has any ordained priests.
1. One must set aside for a moment ... the fact ... that there is not a single Catholic bishop or priest in the world. So that all of the discussions on this Section ... regarding Jurisdiction, "supplied jurisdiction", "epikeia", and "canon law" ... are only relevent ... because this Section uncovers the lies that will be thrown in your face, to shove you into Hell ... by the fake priests (of any group) all of whom are putting on stage shows that look like "Mass".
2a. On 8 December 1965 ... all of the (apparent) Bishops at the "vatican-2 council" approved the well over 200 heresies against prior defined unchangeable Sources of Dogma ... that were in the "vatican-2 council" documents.
2b. When the (apparent) Bishops ... approved the mountain of heresy in the "council" documents ... they immediately ceased begin Catholic Bishops and were automatically excommunicated from the Catholic Church. See Sections 13.2 and 13.2.2 for Dogma on automatic excommunication for heresy or for physical participation in heresy.
3. Because of the spiritual and Dogmatic facts of numbers (1) and (2) above ... (heretic >) "traditionalist groups" set out to establish "workarounds" via the heresy of "supplied jurisdiction" ... to have what they ... in their fantasies thought were "priests" and "Mass".
4. Jurisdiction and Governance is addressed in infallible Sources of Dogma of the Pope in union with the bishops of the world ... listed on Section 87.
5. This Section will show that "supplied jurisdiction" is an illegal and illicit act against the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance. Believing in "supplied jurisdiction" and participating in a group which practices this heresy places you into a heretic state and has you headed for Hell.
6. The words ... "supplied jurisdiction" are nowhere in the twenty dogmatic General Councils, and nowhere in the Denzinger Sources of Catholic Dogma ... not a single time. There is a complete absense" of the fiction of "supplied jurisdiction" in the Solemn Magisterium texts ... which do address hierarchical Jurisdiction granted from the Papacy (vacant in these times).
7. If you are physically participating in a heretical "supplied jurisdiction" group ("sspx", "sspv", "cmri", "independent", etc.) or the vatican-2 heretic cult ... you must take the four steps on Section 2.1 to place your soul in the justified state ... to have a chance of making it to Heaven. This includes making a Formal Abjuration of heresy and ... conditional re-Baptism because virtually all "baptisms" for the last 60 years have been invalid ... see Sections 7.1.1 and 7.7.
This Section includes ...
Sub-part A: The words ... "supplied jurisdiction" are nowhere in the twenty dogmatic General Councils, and nowhere in the Denzinger Sources of Catholic Dogma ... not a single time. There is a complete absense of the fiction of "supplied jurisdiction" in the Solemn Magisterium texts.
S u b - p a r t A There is a complete absence of the fiction of "supplied jurisdiction" in the writings of the General Councils ... which define the Dogma ~ ~ ~
The writings of the Catholic world-wide Councils do not have a single instance of this ... non-Catholic fiction >
We placed all of the Catholic Council texts (20 Councils) into a single MS-word file which ran to 538 pages and proceeded to do searches on this subject in the following manner with the following results:
Searched on --> "supplied jurisdiction" --> not a single occurrence The Denzinger - Sources of Catholic Dogma doesn't have a single instance of this ... non-Catholic fiction >
The Denzinger is organized by numbered articles. There are 2333 (two thousand, three hundred, and thirty three) numbered articles in the Denzinger which documents writings and teachings of Catholic Councils, Popes, and Saints. We placed the entire Denzinger into a single MS-word file which ran to 408 pages and proceeded to do searches on this subject in the following manner with the following results:
Searched on --> "supplied jurisdiction" --> not a single occurrence
Caution: After control of the Denzinger was taken ... by the vatican-2 cult heretics ... heresy has been placed into it such as "baptism of desire".
Search Summary: A total of 946 pages of the formal Catholic teachings were searched, with five different types of searches, so that 4,730 pages were checked using the above search criteria. If "supplied jurisdiction" was the teaching of the Catholic Church it most certainly would be addressed and its parameters defined in these Catholic writings -- at least once -- somewhere.
This is worth repeating:
So where did the "supplied jurisdiction" heresy get started ?
Answer > In the anti-Christ hoax called ... the "1917 code of canon law".
A small pack of heretics led by non-Catholic apostate "cardinal" Gasparri ... worked this evil against the Jurisdiction Dogma ... under the direction of anti-Pope "benedict-15" (1914-1922). Heresies of automatically excommunicated heretic "benedict-15" are listed on Section 20.
Anti-Pope "benedict-15" ... being outside the Catholic Church ... did not have Catholic Jurisdiction to legislate for the Church in the publishing of the "1917 code".
So for two reasons ... the "1917 code" is not a writing of the Catholic Church ... 1) The "code" itself carries heresy and ... 2) The "code" was published by a non-jurisdictional anti-Pope.
Heresies in the "1917 code of canon law" are listed ... on Section 36 Sub-part B.
Please see Section 88 of this website for Catholic citations that we are to place the Faith above stage shows that look like "Mass" ... put on by un-ordained heretics.
The Church does of course supply jurisdiction but in accordance with the formal Dogma which addresses this subject, these Sources of Dogma are in Sub-part B of this Section (the next part).
Just because there is no such thing as Catholic jurisdiction in the world at this time does not mean you cannot get to Heaven. You are fully Catholic and can get to Heaven if you ... 1) Believe the Catholic Sources of Dogma ... 2) Followed water Baptism ... and do works of charity which merit Heaven ... over *100* works Dogmas and scriptures are on Sections 28, 28.1, and 29.
One should take the four steps ... on Section 2.1 to ensure your soul is in the Church ... because virtually all "baptisms" since 1965 have been invalid ... identified on Sections 7.1.1 and 7.7.
S u b - p a r t B Catholic Dogma violated by the "supplied jurisdiction" fraud ~ ~ ~
Council of Florence, Laetentur Coeli, 6 July 1439 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
Question 1: Do the heretic independent meeting halls ("sspx", "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", etc.) satisfy this dogmatic definition, that they are part of a single entity "throughout the entire world" and "governed" under the See of Peter, which is also called here the "entire Church" ? And do any of these groups have ordained priests ?
Answer 1a: No ... none of the above groups have ordained priests. See Sections 105 and 131 ... regarding the "sspx" and "cmri" no-priests groups.
Answer 1b: No. No independent group can meet this definition because they are not within the primacy of jurisdiction "throughout the entire world" of the Roman Pontiff. They are not in the government of the universal Church, and neither are the vatican-2 heretic cult meeting halls.
Answer 1c: No. No independent group has been granted jurisdiction to function as a Catholic entity ... by the Roman Pontiff (an office that has been vacant since 1914).
Answer 1d: In previous times when the Papacy fell temporarily vacant (there have been over 30 anti-Popes) ... the Diocese and Orders were already in place having been granted jurisdiction by valid Popes.
Question 2: Do the vatican-2 heretic meeting halls ("fssp", "indults", "novus ordo") satisfy this dogmatic definition, that they are part of the single Catholic entity which is called the "entire Church" and "governed" under the See of Peter?
Answer 2: No, because the vatican-2 heretic cult was founded on 8 December 1965 (at the Vatican) and has nothing to do with the See of Peter, the Catholic Church, or its governance ... since there are over 200 anti-Christ heresies against Catholic Dogma in the founding documents of the vatican-2 cult ... the "council" documents. See Section 12 of this site. The vatican-2 cult is clearly a different "religion" than the Catholic Church. One heresy against Catholic Dogma causes an organization to be a heretical society. The vatican-2 heretic cult is currently in control of all of our formerly Catholic properties around the world. Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the ... Primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 2 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "Wherefore we teach and declare that, by Divine ordinance, the Roman Church possesses a pre-eminence of ordinary power over every other church, and that this jurisdictional power of the Roman Pontiff is both episcopal and immediate. Both clergy and faithful, of whatever rite and dignity, both singly and collectively, are bound to submit to this power by the duty of hierarchical subordination and true obedience, and this not only in matters concerning faith and morals, but also in those which regard the discipline and government of the Church throughout the world."
Question 1: Do the heretic independent meeting halls ("sspx", "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", etc.) satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are within the "jurisdictional power" of the Roman Pontiff in a "hierarchical subordination", and one government of the Church "throughout the world" ? And do any of these groups have ordained priests ?
Answer 1a: No ... none of the above groups have ordained priests. See Sections 105 and 131 ... regarding the "sspx" and "cmri" no-priests groups.
Answer 1b: No, they are not in a "hierarchical subordination" under the Roman Pontiff "throughout the world" ... and neither are the vatican-2 cult meeting halls.
Answer 1c: No. No independent group has been granted jurisdiction to function as a Catholic entity ... by the Roman Pontiff (an office that has been vacant since 1914).
Answer 1d: In previous times when the Papacy fell temporarily vacant (there have been over 30 anti-Popes) ... the Diocese and Orders were already in place having been granted jurisdiction by valid Popes.
Question 2: Do the vatican-2 heretic meeting halls ("fssp", "indults", "novus ordo") satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are "subordinate" to the Roman Pontiff in a single "hierarchical", one "government" entity ... "throughout the world"?
Answer 2: No, because the vatican-2 heretic cult was founded on 8 December 1965, its founding documents (the documents of the "council") are a rampant rejection of prior defined Catholic Dogma ... so it cannot possibly have anything to do with the Roman Pontiff, the Office of the Papacy, or the Catholic Church. The vatican-2 cult meeting halls have nothing to do with ... a "hierarchical subordination" under the Roman Pontiff "throughout the world", since the Roman Pontiff is of the Catholic Church, and the vatican-2 cult is not of the Catholic Church. Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the ... Primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 9 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "So, then, if anyone says that the Roman Pontiff has merely an office of supervision and guidance, and not the full and supreme power of jurisdiction over the whole Church, and this not only in matters of faith and morals, but also in those which concern the discipline and government of the Church dispersed throughout the whole world; or that he has only the principal part, but not the absolute fullness, of this supreme power; or that this power of his is not ordinary and immediate both over all and each of the churches and over all and each of the pastors and faithful: let him be anathema."
Question 1: Do the heretic independent meeting halls ("sspx", "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", etc.) satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are part of a single "jurisdiction over the whole Church" and in the one government "throughout the whole world" ? And do any of these groups have ordained priests ?
Answer 1a: No ... none of the above groups have ordained priests. See Sections 105 and 131 ... regarding the "sspx" and "cmri" no-priests groups.
Answer 1b: No, since they are not within the government of the succession of Saint Peter and neither are the vatican-2 cult meeting halls.
Answer 1c: No. No independent group has been granted jurisdiction to function as a Catholic entity ... by the Roman Pontiff (an office that has been vacant since 1914).
Answer 1d: In previous times when the Papacy fell temporarily vacant (there have been over 30 anti-Popes) ... the Diocese and Orders were already in place having been granted jurisdiction by valid Popes.
Question 2: Do the vatican-2 heretic meeting halls ("fssp", "indults", "novus ordo") satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are part of the single Catholic "jurisdiction" over the "whole Church" with one government "throughout the whole world"?
Answer 2: No, because the vatican-2 heretic cult was founded on 8 December 1965, its founding documents (the documents of the "council") deviate wildly from prior defined Catholic Dogma ... so it cannot possibly have anything to do with the Roman Pontiff, the Office of the Papacy, or the Catholic Church. The vatican-2 cult meeting halls have nothing to do with ... the discipline and government of the Catholic Church under the Roman Pontiff "throughout the world", since the Roman Pontiff is of the Catholic Church, and the vatican-2 cult is not of the Catholic Church.
Question 3: Do you incur the anathema, (curse on your soul), if you go to an "independent chapel" or a non-Catholic vatican-2 meeting hall?
Answer 3: Yes, you incur the curse. Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the ... Primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 6 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "Furthermore, it follows from that supreme power which the Roman Pontiff has in governing the whole Church, that he has the right, in the performance of this office of his, to communicate freely with the pastors and flocks of the entire Church, so that they may be taught and guided by him in the way of salvation."
Question 1: Do the heretic independent meeting halls ("sspx", "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", etc.) satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are in the "governing of the whole Church" under the Roman Pontiff ? And do any of these groups have ordained priests ?
Answer 1a: No ... none of the above groups have ordained priests. See Sections 105 and 131 ... regarding the "sspx" and "cmri" no-priests groups.
Answer 1b: No, they are not in the "governing of the whole Church" under the Roman Pontiff and neither are the vatican-2 cult meeting halls.
Answer 1c: No. No independent group has been granted jurisdiction to function as a Catholic entity ... by the Roman Pontiff (an office that has been vacant since 1914).
Answer 1d: In previous times when the Papacy fell temporarily vacant (there have been over 30 anti-Popes) ... the Diocese and Orders were already in place having been granted jurisdiction by valid Popes.
Question 2: Do the vatican-2 heretic meeting halls ("fssp", "indults", "novus ordo") satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are under the Roman Pontiff "governing the whole Church"?
Answer 2: No, because the vatican-2 cult meeting halls have nothing to do with the Catholic Roman Pontiff, since their heretic cult does not have the Office of the Papacy, only the Catholic Church has this office. The See of Peter began being operative at the First Pentecost in 33 A.D. while the vatican-2 cult was founded on 8 December 1965. See Section 12 of this site for the heresies in the founding documents of the vatican-2 cult. Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the ... Primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 1 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "The Apostolic see and the Roman Pontiff hold a world-wide primacy, and that ... To him, in Blessed Peter, full power has been given by our Lord Jesus Christ to tend, rule and govern the universal Church."
Question 1: Do the heretic independent meeting halls ("sspx", "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", etc.) satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are part of what Peter "rules and governs" with "full power" as the "universal Church" (a single entity) ? And do any of these groups have ordained priests ?
Answer 1a: No ... none of the above groups have ordained priests. See Sections 105 and 131 ... regarding the "sspx" and "cmri" no-priests groups.
Answer 1b: No, because they are not in the single governance of the Catholic "universal church" and neither are the vatican-2 cult meeting halls.
Answer 1c: No. No independent group has been granted jurisdiction to function as a Catholic entity ... by the Roman Pontiff (an office that has been vacant since 1914).
Answer 1d: In previous times when the Papacy fell temporarily vacant (there have been over 30 anti-Popes) ... the Diocese and Orders were already in place having been granted jurisdiction by valid Popes.
Question 2: Do the Vatican-2 heretic meeting halls meet this definition of being part of what Peter governs with "full power" and which is called here the "universal Church" (a single entity)?
Answer 2: No, because the vatican-2 meeting halls ("fssp", "indults", "novus ordo") are a physical part of the vatican-2 heretic cult which was founded on 8 December 1965 at the Vatican. Since they are part of a heretic cult they have nothing to do with Catholic Saint Peter and his governance of the Catholic Church - which they are not in.
Question 3: Does the vatican-2 cult have the office of the Papacy?
Answer 3: No, only the Catholic Church has the Papacy, so this Dogma is not met by the vatican-2 cult for this reason also. See Section 13.4 of this site. Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 1: On the institution of the Apostolic Primacy in Blessed Peter, Part 1 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "We teach and declare that, according to the gospel evidence, a primacy of jurisdiction over the whole Church of God was immediately and directly promised to the Blessed Apostle Peter and conferred on him by Christ the Lord."
Question 1: Do the heretic independent meeting halls ("sspx", "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", etc.) satisfy this dogmatic definition, that they are part of the single physical entity which is called the "whole Church" which includes a primacy of jurisdiction ? And do any of these groups have ordained priests ?
Answer 1a: No ... none of the above groups have ordained priests. See Sections 105 and 131 ... regarding the "sspx" and "cmri" no-priests groups.
Answer 1b: No. No independent group can meet this definition because they are not within the primacy of jurisdiction of - the single succession continuing from Catholic Saint Peter and neither are the meeting halls of the vatican-2 cult (founded on 8 December 1965)
Answer 1c: No. No independent group has been granted jurisdiction to function as a Catholic entity ... by the Roman Pontiff (an office that has been vacant since 1914).
Answer 1d: In previous times when the Papacy fell temporarily vacant (there have been over 30 anti-Popes) ... the Diocese and Orders were already in place having been granted jurisdiction by valid Popes.
Question 2: Do the vatican-2 meeting halls ("fssp", "indults", "novus ordo") satisfy this dogmatic definition, that they are part of a single entity which is called the "whole Church" which includes a primacy of jurisdiction?
Answer 2: No, because the vatican-2 heretic cult is not within the primacy of jurisdiction of - the single succession continuing from Catholic Saint Peter ... they are a heretic cult that was founded in 1965 at the Vatican ... see Section 12 of this website for their heresies. Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 1: On the institution of the Apostolic Primacy in Blessed Peter, Part 6 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "Therefore, if anyone says that Blessed Peter the Apostle was not appointed by Christ the Lord as prince of all the Apostles and visible head of the whole church militant; or that it was a primacy of honour only and not one of true and proper jurisdiction that he directly and immediately received from our Lord Jesus Christ Himself: let him be anathema."
Question 1: Do the heretic independent meeting halls ("sspx", "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", etc.) satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are part of what is called the "whole Church militant" with a "visible head" that has "true and proper jurisdiction" ? And do any of these groups have ordained priests ?
Answer 1a: No ... none of the above groups have ordained priests. See Sections 105 and 131 ... regarding the "sspx" and "cmri" no-priests groups.
Answer 1b: No. The "independents" cannot meet this definition because they are not a physical part of the "whole Church militant" within the "proper jurisdiction" which Saint Peter received directly from our Lord and neither are the meeting halls of the vatican-2 heretic cult.
Answer 1c: No. No independent group has been granted jurisdiction to function as a Catholic entity ... by the Roman Pontiff (an office that has been vacant since 1914).
Answer 1d: In previous times when the Papacy fell temporarily vacant (there have been over 30 anti-Popes) ... the Diocese and Orders were already in place having been granted jurisdiction by valid Popes.
Question 2: Do the vatican-2 meeting halls ("fssp", "indults", "novus ordo") satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are part of what is called the "whole Church" with a "visible head" that has "true and proper jurisdiction"?
Answer 2: No. The vatican-2 meeting halls cannot meet this definition because they are not part of a "whole Church militant" within the "proper jurisdiction" which Saint Peter received directly from our Lord ... since the heresy which they are a physical part of was founded on 8 December 1965 at the Vatican. These buildings have nothing to do with Saint Peter receiving the true and proper jurisdiction from Christ which was an event of the Catholic Church, not of the vatican-2 cult. See Section 13.4 of this site.
Question 3: Does one incur the anathema, (curse on your soul), if you go to "independent chapels" or to the vatican-2 meeting halls?
Answer 3: Yes, you incur the curse on your soul. Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the ... Primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 8 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "Since the Roman Pontiff, by the Divine right of the Apostolic primacy, governs the whole Church, we likewise teach and declare that he is the supreme judge of the faithful."
Question 1: Do the "independent chapels" ("sspx", "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", etc.) satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are a part of the Roman Pontiff "governing the whole Church" ? And do any of these groups have ordained priests ?
Answer 1a: No ... none of the above groups have ordained priests. See Sections 105 and 131 ... regarding the "sspx" and "cmri" no-priests groups.
Answer 1b: No, they are not part of the Roman Pontiff "governing the whole Church" and neither are the meeting halls of the vatican-2 heretic cult.
Answer 1c: No. No independent group has been granted jurisdiction to function as a Catholic entity ... by the Roman Pontiff (an office that has been vacant since 1914).
Answer 1d: In previous times when the Papacy fell temporarily vacant (there have been over 30 anti-Popes) ... the Diocese and Orders were already in place having been granted jurisdiction by valid Popes.
Question 2: Do the vatican-2 heretic meeting halls ("fssp", "indults", "novus ordo") satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are a part of the Roman Pontiff "governing the whole Church"?
Answer 2: No, because the vatican-2 meeting halls are a physical part of the vatican-2 heresy which was founded in 1965 at the Vatican, they have nothing to do with ... the Roman Pontiff, the Office of the Papacy, or the Catholic Church. See the rampant rejection of Catholic Dogma in the founding documents of the vatican-2 heretic cult (the documents of the "council") in Section 12 of this site.
S u b - p a r t C Related citations on Jurisdiction ~ ~ ~
Pope Pius IX, Quanta cura, 8 Dec 1864 >
Note 1: All groups ... where there is something that looks like Catholic Mass ... are soul damning liars against Catholic Dogma which is why ... they are simply putting on stage shows that look like "Mass". Identified on Section 13.6.
Note 2: The Sources of Dogma that going to these stage shows ... shoves you into Hell is listed on Section 13.2.2. ~ ~
~ ~
Pope Leo XIII, Testem Benevolentiae, 22 January 1899 >
Note 1: All groups ... where there is something that looks like Catholic Mass ... are soul damning liars against Catholic Dogma which is why ... they are simply putting on stage shows that look like "Mass". Identified on Section 13.6.
Note 2: The Sources of Dogma that going to these stage shows ... shoves you into Hell is listed on Section 13.2.2. ~ ~
~ ~
Pope Pius IX, Graves Ac Diuturnae (# 4), 23 March 1875 >
Note 1: All groups ... where there is something that looks like Catholic Mass ... are soul damning liars against Catholic Dogma which is why ... they are simply putting on stage shows that look like "Mass".
Note 2: The Sources of Dogma that going to these stage shows ... shoves you into Hell is listed on Section 13.2.2.
Note 3: Avoid all the fraud groups ... who have something that looks like "Mass" ... do not profane Sunday in their anti-Christ groups.
Note 4: Pray the Mass prayers at home. Purchase a 1945 New Roman Missal, it will also say Fr. Lasance on it. Do not buy the ... 1962 corrupt "missal". Do not purchase from ... Angelus Press ("sspx"), Fraternity of Saint Peter ("fssp"), Sophia Institute ... you would be supporting heretic groups (more than the other vendors of the Missal). Follow a traditional Catholic calendar to get to the ... propers for the given Sunday.
S u b - p a r t D The "supplied jurisdiction" heresy ... in the heretical "1917 code of canon law" ~ ~ ~
The following extract from the "1917 code of canon law" ... is the primary excuse ... that heretic cults such as the "sspx", "sspv", "cmri", "independents", etc. ... offer to the customers of their stage shows that look like Catholic Mass ... for their operating outside of the Catholic Jurisdiction Dogma.
The heretical "canon 209" - of the "1917 code" >
The reasons that the above "canon 209" cannot be used to ... reject the Jurisdiction Dogma listed in Sub-part B above are obvious ...
1. Regarding the text ... "In common error" ... there can be no "common error" ... *because* the Jurisdiction Dogma listed on Sub-part B (above) is completely clear to all ... that all Jurisdiction to function as a Catholic entity must be granted by the Pope (currently vacant).
2. Regarding the text ... "in positive or probable doubt" ... there can be no "positive or probable doubt", since the Jurisdiction Dogma on Sub-part B (above) is clear that all Jurisdiction to function as a Catholic entity must be granted by the Pope (currently vacant).
3. A writing of (what is supposed to be) the Ordinary Magisterium (from a small select group of persons) ... cannot supercede, contradict, or reject Solemn Magisterium Sources of Dogma from the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... on any subject which is addressed by the Solemn Magisterium. Jurisdiction is addressed by the Solemn Magisterium in the Dogma listed in Sub-part B above.
4. The fraudulent "canon 209" ... contradicts and rejects the Catholic Jurisdiction Sources of Dogma ... therefore "canon 209" is heresy.
The heretics of the above listed groups (dressed like Catholic priests) ... may offer some other source document as an excuse to put on stage shows that look like Catholic Mass ... and the rejection of their lies ... would be by the same method cited here regarding the "canon 209" fraud.
S u b - p a r t E Inescapable conclusions: ~ ~ ~
1. The Catholic Church has dogmatically defined that there is one and only one source of Catholic jurisdiction in the world and that is from a hierarchy which governs the world wide Church from the Vatican. The fact that the Catholic Church has lost all of its properties around the world to Satan's vatican-2 heretic cult (founded on 8 December 1965) does not give anyone the right ... to set up "independents" with Catholic looking fake "Mass" run by un-ordained heretics dressed like priests ... such as the "sspx", "sspv", "Thuc line", "cmri", other "independents", etc. ... which are sending all it's participants into Hell.
2. Please see Section 13.2.2 for the Dogma which defines that physical participation in heretic cults automatically excommunicates you from the Catholic Church. Section 88 has additional citations that we must place the Faith before stage shows that look like "Mass".
3. We simply have to face the facts as seen through the Catholic Dogma: God has allowed the Mass to be taken away as a punishment. He has also allowed the offices of Catholic bishops and priests to fall empty as a punishment.
4. If anyone tries to go around these punishments, it places you outside of the Catholic Church for heresy against the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance.
5. If you've been mixed up in one the anti-Christ fake "traditionalist" groups ... or in vatican-2 ... you must take the four steps on Section 2.1 to place your soul into the justified state. Section 2.1 includes conditional re-Baptism since virtually all "baptisms" since 1965 have been invalid ... identified on Sections 7.1.1 and 7.7.
- - - - - - - - - -
What to do regarding Sundays and keeping them Holy ...
> Stay home and keep Sunday Holy by praying the Mass prayers from the ... 1945 New Roman Missal it will have "Fr. Lasance" on the cover. Do not buy the 1962 corrupt "missal". ~ ~ ~ ~
<<< --- <<< --- <<<
--- <<< --- End Section 99 --- >>> ---
>>> --- >>> --- >>>
Immaculate Heart of Mary ~ Our Lady of Good Remedy ~ Our Lady of La Salette ~
Immaculate Heart of Mary ~ Wear the Brown Scapular as the Blessed Virgin instructed us ... as Our Lady of Mount Carmel ~
Truth of the super-natural order:
Ignorance of God's Catholic Dogma ... which is being aggressively hidden with malice ... is not a "loophole" into Heaven.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
