|
It is 100% certain you're headed for Hell ...
for rejecting the Catholic Dogma ...
Warning: There are no bishops or priests in these times
1. The Original Sin of Adam closed Heaven for all men (sanctifying grace was lost) ... Hell became the only possible destination for the immortal souls of men.
7. One can still be Catholic and get to Heaven with a proper baptism in water
[Section 7] ... believing the Dogmas ... and keeping free from mortal sin. [Section 10.1]
E-mail > Slave_BVM@mail.com -- Catholic-Dogma-Providers@mail.com
<<< --- <<< --- <<< --- <<< --- Start Section 99 --- >>> --- >>> --- >>> --- >>>
Against the "supplied jurisdiction" ... non-Catholic fraud
"Supplied jurisdiction" is soul damning heresy ... it
"Supplied jurisdiction" is ... 100% against the
~ ~ ~
Introduction:
1. On 8 December 1965 ... all of the (apparent) Bishops at the "vatican-2 council" approved the well over 200 heresies against prior defined unchangeable Sources of Dogma ... that were / are in the "vatican-2 council" documents.
2. When the (apparent) Bishops ... approved the mountain of heresy in the "council" documents ... they immediately ceased begin Catholic Bishops and were automatically excommunicated from the Catholic Church. See Sections 13.2 and 13.2.2 for Dogma on automatic excommunication for heresy or for physical participation in heresy.
3. Because of the spiritual and Dogmatic facts of numbers (1) and (2) above ... groups set out to establish "workarounds" via the heresy of "supplied jurisdiction".
4. Jurisdiction and Governance is addressed in infallible Sources of Dogma of the Pope in union with the bishops of the world.
5. This Section will show that "supplied jurisdiction" is an illegal and illicit act against the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance. Believing in "supplied jurisdiction" and participating in a group which practices this heresy places you into a heretical state and has you headed for Hell.
6. The words ... "supplied jurisdiction" are nowhere in the twenty dogmatic General Councils, and nowhere in the Denzinger Sources of Catholic Dogma ... not a single time. There is a complete absense" of the fiction of "supplied jurisdiction" in the Solemn Magisterium texts ... which do address hierarchical Jurisdiction granted from the Papacy (vacant in these times).
7. If you are physically participating in a heretical "supplied jurisdiction" group ("sspx", "sspv", "cmri", "independent", etc.) or the vatican-2 heretic cult ... please proceed to Section 19.1 and make the first Abjuration that is there to enter the Catholic Church (which has no properties in these times).
This Section includes ...
Sub-part A: The words ... "supplied jurisdiction" are nowhere in the twenty dogmatic General Councils, and nowhere in the Denzinger Sources of Catholic Dogma ... not a single time. There is a complete absense of the fiction of "supplied jurisdiction" in the Solemn Magisterium texts.
S u b - p a r t A There is a complete absence of the fiction of "supplied jurisdiction" in the writings of the worldwide Catholic Councils and in the Denzinger, Sources of Catholic Dogma ~ ~ ~
The writings of the Catholic world-wide Councils do not have a single instance of this ... non-Catholic fiction >
We placed all of the Catholic Council texts (20 Councils) into a single MS-word file which ran to 538 pages and proceeded to do searches on this subject in the following manner with the following results:
Searched on --> "supplied jurisdiction" --> not a single occurrence The Denzinger - Sources of Catholic Dogma doesn't have a single instance of this ... non-Catholic fiction >
The Denzinger is organized by numbered articles. There are 2333 (two thousand, three hundred, and thirty three) numbered articles in the Denzinger which documents writings and teachings of Catholic Councils, Popes, and Saints. We placed the entire Denzinger into a single MS-word file which ran to 408 pages and proceeded to do searches on this subject in the following manner with the following results:
Searched on --> "supplied jurisdiction" --> not a single occurrence Search Summary: A total of 946 pages of the formal Catholic teachings were searched, with five different types of searches, so that 4,730 pages were checked using the above search criteria. If "supplied jurisdiction" was the teaching of the Catholic Church it most certainly would be addressed and its parameters defined in these Catholic writings -- at least once -- somewhere.
This is worth repeating:
So where did the "supplied jurisdiction" heresy get started? It looks very much like it was started by non-Catholic apostate "cardinal" Gasparri who was the architect of the non-Catholic fiction called the "1917 Code of Canon Law". Gasparri worked this evil under the direction of anti-Pope "Benedict XV" (1914-1922) -- both of these men are in Hell since they did not publically abjure of their publically promulgated heresy before they died. See some of the heresy of "Benedict XV" in Section 20 of this website.
Please see Section 88 of this website for Catholic citations that we are to place the Faith above sacrifice.
The Church does of course supply jurisdiction but in accordance with the formal Dogma which addresses this subject, these Sources of Dogma are in the next part of this Section. Just because there is no such thing as Catholic jurisdiction in the world at this time does not mean you cannot get to Heaven. You are fully Catholic and can get to Heaven if you are baptized and believe the Dogma of the Church (including the Dogma regarding jurisdiction and governance) and do works of charity which merit Heaven.
S u b - p a r t B Catholic Dogma violated by the "supplied jurisdiction" fraud ~ ~ ~
Council of Florence, Laetentur Coeli (Decree of Union), 6 July 1439 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
Question 1: Do the "independents" ("SSPX", "SSPV", "CMRI", "Thuc line", etc.) satisfy this dogmatic definition, that they are part of a single entity "throughout the entire world" and "governed" under the See of Peter, which is also called here the "entire Church"?
Answer 1: No. No independent group can meet this definition because they are not within the primacy of jurisdiction of - the single succession continuing from Catholic Saint Peter.
Question 2: Do the Vatican-2 meeting halls ("FSSP", "indults", "novus ordo") satisfy this dogmatic definition, that they are part of a single entity which is called the "entire Church" and "governed" under the See of Peter?
Answer 2: No, because the Vatican-2 jew-heretic cult is not within the governance of the See of Peter ... since there are over 200 anti-Christ heresies in the "Vatican-2 council" documents, the vatican-2-ists are a different "religion" than the Catholic Church. One heresy against Catholic Dogma causes an organization to be a heretical society, see Section 12 for some of the heresies of the Vatican-2 cult. The Vatican-2 heretic cult controls all of our formerly Catholic properties around the world.
Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 1: On the institution of the Apostolic Primacy in Blessed Peter, Part 1 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "We teach and declare that, according to the gospel evidence, a primacy of jurisdiction over the whole Church of God was immediately and directly promised to the Blessed Apostle Peter and conferred on him by Christ the Lord."
Question 1: Do the "independents" ("SSPX", "SSPV", "CMRI", "Thuc line", etc.) satisfy this dogmatic definition, that they are part of a single entity which is called the "whole Church" which includes a primacy of jurisdiction?
Answer 1: No. No independent group can meet this definition because they are not within the primacy of jurisdiction of - the single succession continuing from Catholic Saint Peter.
Question 2: Do the Vatican-2 meeting halls ("FSSP", "indults", "novus ordo") satisfy this dogmatic definition, that they are part of a single entity which is called the "whole Church" which includes a primacy of jurisdiction?
Answer 2: No, because the Vatican-2 jew-heretic cult is not within the primacy of jurisdiction of - the single succession continuing from Catholic Saint Peter ... they are a heresy that was started in 1965 at the Vatican (see Section 12 of this website).
Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 1: On the institution of the Apostolic Primacy in Blessed Peter, Part 6 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "Therefore, if anyone says that Blessed Peter the Apostle was not appointed by Christ the Lord as prince of all the Apostles and visible head of the whole church militant; or that it was a primacy of honour only and not one of true and proper jurisdiction that he directly and immediately received from our Lord Jesus Christ Himself: let him be anathema."
Question 1: Do the "independents" ("SSPX", "SSPV", "CMRI", "Thuc line", etc.) satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are part of what is called the "whole Church" with a "visible head" that has "true and proper jurisdiction"?
Answer 1: No. The "independents" cannot meet this definition because they are not part of a "whole Church" within the "proper jurisdiction" which Saint Peter received directly from our Lord.
Question 2: Do the Vatican-2 meeting halls ("FSSP", "indults", "novus ordo") satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are part of what is called the "whole Church" with a "visible head" that has "true and proper jurisdiction"?
Answer 2: No. The Vatican-2 meeting halls cannot meet this definition because they are not part of a "whole Church" within the "proper jurisdiction" which Saint Peter received directly from our Lord ... since the heresy which they are a physical part of was started in 1965 at the Vatican. These buildings have nothing to do with Saint Peter receiving the true and proper jurisdiction from Christ which was an event of the Catholic Church, not of the Vatican-2 cult.
Question 3: Does one incur the anathema, (curse on your soul), if you go to "independents" or to the Vatican-2 meeting halls?
Answer 3: Yes, you incur this curse on your soul.
Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the ... Primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 1 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "The Apostolic see and the Roman Pontiff hold a world-wide primacy, and that ... To him, in Blessed Peter, full power has been given by our Lord Jesus Christ to tend, rule and govern the universal Church."
Question 1: Do the "independents" ("SSPX", "SSPV", "CMRI", "Thuc line", etc.) satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are part of what Peter governs with "full power" as the "universal Church" (a single entity)?
Answer 1: No, because they are not in the single governance of the "universal church".
Question 2: Do the Vatican-2 heretic meeting halls meet this definition of being part of what Peter governs with "full power" and which is called here the "universal Church" (a single entity)?
Answer 2: No, because the Vatican-2 meeting halls ("FSSP", "indults", "novus ordo") are a physical part of the Vatican-2 heresy which was started in 1965 at the Vatican (see Section 12 of this website). Since they are in a heresy they have nothing to do with Catholic Saint Peter and his governance of the Catholic Church - which they are not in.
Question 3: Does the Vatican-2 cult have the office of the Papacy?
Answer 3: No, only the Catholic Church has the Papacy, so this Dogma is not met by the Vatican-2 cult for this reason also.
Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the ... Primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 2 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "Wherefore we teach and declare that, by Divine ordinance, the Roman Church possesses a pre-eminence of ordinary power over every other church, and that this jurisdictional power of the Roman Pontiff is both episcopal and immediate. Both clergy and faithful, of whatever rite and dignity, both singly and collectively, are bound to submit to this power by the duty of hierarchical subordination and true obedience, and this not only in matters concerning faith and morals, but also in those which regard the discipline and government of the Church throughout the world."
Question 1: Do the "independents" ("SSPX", "SSPV", "CMRI", "Thuc line", etc.) satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are "subordinate" to a single "hierarchical", one government Church "throughout the world"?
Answer 1: No, they are not in a "hierarchical subordination" under the Roman Pontiff "throughout the world".
Question 2: Do the Vatican-2 heretic meeting halls ("FSSP", "indults", "novus ordo") satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are "subordinate" a single "hierarchical", one government Church "throughout the world"?
Answer 2: No, because the Vatican-2 meeting halls are a physical part of the Vatican-2 heresy which was started in 1965 at the Vatican, they have nothing to do with ... a "hierarchical subordination" under the Roman Pontiff "throughout the world", since the Roman Pontiff is of the Catholic Church, and the Vatican-2 cult is not of the Catholic Church.
Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the ... Primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 6 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "Furthermore, it follows from that supreme power which the Roman Pontiff has in governing the whole Church, that he has the right, in the performance of this office of his, to communicate freely with the pastors and flocks of the entire Church, so that they may be taught and guided by him in the way of salvation."
Question 1: Do the "independents" ("SSPX", "SSPV", "CMRI", "Thuc line", etc.) satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are "subordinate" to a single "hierarchical", one government Church "throughout the world"?
Answer 1: No, they are not in a "hierarchical subordination" under the Roman Pontiff "throughout the world".
Question 2: Do the Vatican-2 heretic meeting halls ("FSSP", "indults", "novus ordo") satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are "subordinate" a single "hierarchical", one government Church "throughout the world"?
Answer 2: No, because the Vatican-2 meeting halls are a physical part of the Vatican-2 heresy which was started in 1965 at the Vatican, they have nothing to do with ... a "hierarchical subordination" under the Roman Pontiff "throughout the world", since the Roman Pontiff is of the Catholic Church, and the Vatican-2 cult is not of the Catholic Church.
Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the ... Primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 8 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "Since the Roman Pontiff, by the Divine right of the Apostolic primacy, governs the whole Church, we likewise teach and declare that he is the supreme judge of the faithful."
Question 1: Do the "independents" ("SSPX", "SSPV", "CMRI", "Thuc line", etc.) satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are "subordinate" to a single "hierarchical", one government Church "throughout the world"?
Answer 1: No, they are not in a "hierarchical subordination" under the Roman Pontiff "throughout the world".
Question 2: Do the Vatican-2 heretic meeting halls ("FSSP", "indults", "novus ordo") satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are "subordinate" a single "hierarchical", one government Church "throughout the world"?
Answer 2: No, because the Vatican-2 meeting halls are a physical part of the Vatican-2 heresy which was started in 1965 at the Vatican, they have nothing to do with ... a "hierarchical subordination" under the Roman Pontiff "throughout the world", since the Roman Pontiff is of the Catholic Church, and the Vatican-2 cult is not of the Catholic Church.
Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the ... Primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 9 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "So, then, if anyone says that the Roman pontiff has merely an office of supervision and guidance, and not the full and supreme power of jurisdiction over the whole Church, and this not only in matters of faith and morals, but also in those which concern the discipline and government of the Church dispersed throughout the whole world; or that he has only the principal part, but not the absolute fullness, of this supreme power; or that this power of his is not ordinary and immediate both over all and each of the churches and over all and each of the pastors and faithful: let him be anathema."
Question 1: Do the "independents" ("SSPX", "SSPV", "CMRI", "Thuc line", etc.) satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are part of a "jurisdiction" over the "whole Church" with one government "throughout the whole world"?
Answer 1: No, since they are not within the government of the succession of Saint Peter.
Question 2: Do the Vatican-2 heretic meeting halls ("FSSP", "indults", "novus ordo") satisfy this dogmatic definition that they are part of a "jurisdiction" over the "whole Church" with one government "throughout the whole world"?
Answer 2: No, since they are not within the government of the succession of Saint Peter because they are a physical part of the Vatican-2 heresy which was started in 1965 at the Vatican.
Question 3: Do you incur the anathema, (curse on your soul), if you go to an "independent" or a non-Catholic Vatican-2 meeting hall?
Answer 3: Yes, you incur this curse.
S u b - p a r t C Related citations on Jurisdiction ~ ~ ~
Pope Pius IX, Quanta cura, 8 Dec 1864 >
Note: The non-Catholic Vatican-2 cult is not in accord with this instruction from Pope Pius IX because they are not a Catholic group, while other groups that offer Catholic looking liturgy ("SSPX", "SSPV", "CMRI", etc.) are not because they are all in violation of the Sources of Dogma which address jurisdiction and governance shown above.
Pope Leo XIII, Testem Benevolentiae, 22 January 1899 > "Now the history of all past ages is witness that this Apostolic See, to which not only the office of teaching, but also the supreme government of the whole Church were assigned, has indeed continually adhered ‘to the same doctrine, in the same sense, and in the same mind’."
Note: The non-Catholic Vatican-2 cult is not in accord with this instruction from Pope Leo XIII because they are not a Catholic group, while other groups that offer Catholic looking liturgy ("SSPX", "SSPV", "CMRI", etc.) are not because they are in violation of the Sources of Dogma which address jurisdiction and governance.
Pope Pius IX, Graves Ac Diuturnae (# 4), 23 March 1875 > "They (the faithful) should totally shun their "religious" celebrations, their buildings, and their chairs of pestilence which they have with impunity established to "transmit" the sacred teachings. They should shun their writings and all contact with them. They should not have any dealings or meetings with usurping priests and apostates from the faith who dare to exercise the duties of an ecclesiastical "minister" without possessing a legitimate mission or any jurisdiction."
Note 1: The Vatican-2 heretic cult is not part of the one governance of the Church since the Vatican-2-ists operate their "chairs of pestilence" out of what used to be our Catholic buildings, which we are instructed here to shun (See Sections 12 through 21 of this website). We are to reject their writings (which includes all of the "Vatican-2 council" documents) and avoid contact with them.
Note 2: In these times, when Catholic jurisdiction or governance does not exist (since the bishop offices have all fallen vacant) ... one simply keeps to the Catholic De Fide Dogma (Section 3) and Sources of Dogma which have been promulgated by the prior legitimate Catholic authorities ... in order to be in the Catholic Church.
Note 3: The Vatican-2-ists lack "legitimate mission and jurisdiction" because Christ only founded the Catholic Church, He did not start the Vatican-2 heresy in 1965 -- for this reason the Vatican-2 heretic meeting halls are outside of the one governance of the Church. The Vatican-2 apostasy was set up prior to 1962 by anti-Popes "Benedict XV", "Pius XI", "Pius XII", and "John XXIII" (See Sections 12.9, 20, 20.1, and 20.2 of this website).
Note 4: None of the heretics (including the Vatican-2 heretics) are "transmitting the sacred teachings" (which is the Catholic Dogmas) they are transmitting their man-made fables - various heresies against the Catholic truths.
S u b - p a r t D The "supplied jurisdiction" heresy ... in the heretical "1917 code of canon law" ~ ~ ~
The following extract from the "1917 code of canon law" ... is the primary excuse ... that heretic cults such as the "sspx", "sspv", "cmri", "independents", etc. ... offer to the consumers of their stage shows that look like Catholic Mass, for their operating outside of the Catholic Jurisdiction Dogma.
The heretical "canon 209" - of the "1917 code" >
The reasons that the above "canon 209" cannot be used to ... reject the Jurisdiction Dogma listed in Sub-part B above are obvious ...
1. Regarding the text ... "In common error" ... there can be no "common error", since the Jurisdiction Dogma is clear that all Jurisdiction to function as a Catholic entity must be granted by the Pope (currently vacant).
2. Regarding the text ... "in positive or probable doubt" ... there can be no "positive or probable doubt", since the Jurisdiction Dogma is clear that all Jurisdiction to function as a Catholic entity must be granted by the Pope (currently vacant).
3. A writing of (what is supposed to be) the Ordinary Magisterium (such as "canon law" from select group of persons) ... cannot supercede, contradict, or reject Solemn Magisterium Sources of Dogma from the Pope in union with the bishops of the world ... on any subject which is addressed by the Solemn Magisterium. Jurisdiction is addressed by the Solemn Magisterium in the Dogma listed in Sub-part B above.
4. The fraudulent "canon 209" ... contradicts and rejects the Catholic Jurisdiction Sources of Dogma ... therefore "canon 209" is heresy.
The heretics of the above listed groups (dressed like Catholic priests) ... may offer some other source document as an excuse to put on stage shows that look like Catholic Mass ... and the rejection of their lies is same method cited regarding "canon 209".
S u b - p a r t E Inescapable conclusions: ~ ~ ~
1. The Catholic Church has dogmatically defined that there is one and only one source of Catholic jurisdiction in the world and that is from a hierarchy which governs the world wide Church from the Vatican. The fact that the Catholic Church has lost all of its properties around the world to Satan's Vatican-2 heretic cult (founded on 8 December 1965) does not give anyone the right to set up "independents" with Catholic looking liturgies such as the "sspx", "sspv", "Thuc line", "cmri", other "independents", etc. -- all of the "independents" send you into Hell.
2. We simply have to face the facts as seen through the Catholic Dogma: God has allowed the Mass to be taken away as a punishment. He has also allowed the offices of Catholic bishops and priests to fall empty as a punishment.
3. If anyone tries to go around these punishments, it places you outside of the Catholic Church for heresy against the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance. 4. Please see Section 13.2.2 for the Dogma which defines that physical participation in heretic cults automatically excommunicates you from the Catholic Church. Section 88 has additional citations that we must place the Faith before what looks like "Mass". Do not profane Sunday by going to illegal non-jurisdictional "independents" or by participating in the vatican-2 heretic cult. Simply pray the Mass prayers at home in these times with a Fr. Lasance Missal (1945 Edition is widely available). Do not support the "sspx" heretics or "fssp" heretics by buying a Missal from their filthy anti-Christ websites. ~ ~ ~ ~
<<< --- <<< --- <<<
--- <<< --- End Section 99 --- >>> ---
>>> --- >>> --- >>>
Immaculate Heart of Mary ~ Our Lady of Good Remedy ~ Our Lady of La Salette ~
Immaculate Heart of Mary ~ Wear the Brown Scapular as the Blessed Virgin instructed us ... as Our Lady of Mount Carmel ~
Truth of the super-natural order:
Ignorance of God's Catholic Dogma ... which is being aggressively hidden with malice ... is not a "loophole" into Heaven.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
