Catholic Faith (pre-fulfillment) writing of Ecclesiasticus 24:44
"For I make doctrine to shine forth to all as the morning light."
Catholic writing of 2 Saint John 1:9
"Whosoever revolts, and continues not in the doctrine of Christ, has not God."
~ ~ ~
Introduction:
1. The "orthodox" claim that they accept the first seven General Councils as valid ... that is, they were Divinely inspired and protected by the Holy Spirit from error.
2. These Councils occurred from 325 A.D. to 787 A.D. - - two at Nicaea, three at Constantinople, one at Ephesus, and one at Chalcedon.
3. The "orthodox" claim to abide by these Councils ... these Councils attest to the Office of the Papacy and the Catholic Apostolic Church ... which the "orthodox" now reject ... they "changed their minds".
4. The "orthodox" claim to abide by these Councils ... but these Councils attest that the Catholic Church has the one Apostolic succession ... which the "orthodox" reject. There were twelve Apostles, but Apostolic succession only runs through Saint Peter, this brings unity of faith, jurisdiction, and goverance.
5. This amounts to the simple conclusion and re-confirms the fact ... that the "orthodox" are not Christian ... as we already saw, by the list of heresies of the "orthodox" on Section 8.6.
6. Note 1 to "orthodox" ... avoid all buildings with Catholic signs out front, they are heretic meeting halls of the vatican-2 heresy, the sspx, sspv, cmri, or like groups ... and will send you into Hell as the "orthodox" heresy is currently doing.
7. Note 2 to "orthodox" ... if you want to be Christian someday, so you will have some chance of getting to Heaven (if you do sufficient works of charity) ... please see the Abjuration of heresy instructions on Section 19.1 of this site. Please make the Abjuration in the context of the steps on Section 2.1.
Third Council of Constantinople, Exposition of Faith section, 680 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"It approves as well the other synodal report to his God-taught serenity, from the synod of 125 bishops dear to God meeting under the same most holy Pope, as according with the Holy Synod at Chalcedon and with the Tome of the all-holy and most blessed Leo, Pope of the same elder Rome, which was sent to Flavian."
Identifying the "orthodox" fraud ... in saying that they accept the Third Council of Constantinople ...
1. The "orthodox" claim they accept the Third Council of Constantinople ... as being Divinely inspired.
2. The Third Council of Constantinople in the above extract ... attests to the Office of the Papacy, twice.
3. God never changes ... He did establish the Office of the Papacy (currently vacant, see Sections 12 and 13).
4. The "orthodox" are rejecting the Papacy ... that "they say" they should be ascribing to ... by accepting the Third Council of Constantinople as valid.
5. This proves again ... that all of the "orthodox" are in a heretic state ... that sends their immortal souls into Hell outside of the Catholic Church (which has no buildings at this time).
Note: The reference to "elder Rome" (in the Council extract) is in the context of Constantinople being the "new Rome" ... the new secular capital of the Roman Empire.
Second Council of Constantinople, Three Chapters section, 553 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"The official pronouncements of the Holy Synods, namely the first of Ephesus and that of Chalcedon, on the subject of the letters of Cyril of holy memory and of Leo of blessed memory, formerly Pope of older Rome. We gathered from these authorities ..."
Identifying the "orthodox" fraud ... in saying that they accept the Second Council of Constantinople ...
1. The "orthodox" claim they accept the Second Council of Constantinople ... as being Divinely inspired.
2. The Second Council of Constantinople in the above extract ... attests to the Office of the Papacy.
3. God never changes ... He did establish the Office of the Papacy (currently vacant, see Sections 12 and 13).
4. The "orthodox" are rejecting the Papacy ... that "they say" they should be ascribing to ... by accepting the Second Council of Constantinople as valid.
5. This proves again ... that all of the "orthodox" are in a heretic state ... that sends their immortal souls into Hell outside of the Catholic Church (which has no buildings at this time).
Note: The reference to "older Rome" (in the Council extract) is in the context of Constantinople being the "new Rome" ... the new secular capital of the Roman Empire.
Third Council of Constantinople, Exposition of Faith section, 680 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"This same holy and universal synod, here present, faithfully accepts and welcomes with open hands the report of Agatho, most holy and most blessed Pope of elder Rome."
Identifying the "orthodox" fraud ... in saying that they accept the Third Council of Constantinople ...
1. The "orthodox" claim they accept the Third Council of Constantinople ... as being Divinely inspired.
2. The Third Council of Constantinople in the above extract ... attests to the Office of the Papacy.
3. God never changes ... He did establish the Office of the Papacy (currently vacant, see Sections 12 and 13).
4. The "orthodox" are rejecting the Papacy ... that "they say" they should be ascribing to ... by accepting the Third Council of Constantinople as valid.
5. This proves again ... that all of the "orthodox" are in a heretic state ... that sends their immortal souls into Hell outside of the Catholic Church (which has no buildings at this time).
Note: The reference to "elder Rome" (in the Council extract) is in the context of Constantinople being the "new Rome" ... the new secular capital of the Roman Empire.
Second Council of Nicaea, Definition section, 787 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"We who are those responsible for the priesthood everywhere, in order that the Divinely inspired Tradition of the Catholic Church should receive confirmation by a public decree."
Identifying the "orthodox" fraud ... in saying that they accept the Second Council of Nicaea ...
1. The "orthodox" claim they accept the Second Council of Nicaea ... as being Divinely inspired.
2. The Second Council of Nicaea in the above extract ... defines that the Catholic Church is ... responsible for the priesthood everywhere.
3. God never changes ... He did establish one priesthood to offer sacrifice. Catholic Mass is not available in these times but you can still be Catholic and get to Heaven, see Section 13.6 of this site.
4. The "orthodox" are rejecting the spiritual fact that the Catholic Church is responsible for the priesthood everywhere ... that they should be agreeing with ... since they accept the Second Council of Nicaea as valid.
5. This proves again ... that all of the "orthodox" are in a heretic state ... that sends their immortal souls into Hell outside of the Catholic Church (which has no buildings at this time).
Council of Chalcedon, Letter of Pope Leo to Flavian Section, 451 A.D. >
The Letter to Flavian is part of the Council of Chalcedon text ... it defends the Incarnation, the Water Baptism Dogma, condemns errors Eutyches, etc."
Identifying the "orthodox" fraud ... in saying that they accept the Council of Chalcedon ...
1. The Council of Chalcedon has a Section entitled ... "The letter of Pope Leo to Flavian, bishop of Constantinople, about Eutyches".
2. The Council of Chalcedon therefore attests to the Office of the Papacy ... being in primacy over the Constantinople See.
3. God never changes ... He did establish the Office of the Papacy (currently vacant, see Sections 12 and 13).
4. The "orthodox" are rejecting the Papacy ... that "they say" they should be ascribing to ... by accepting the Council of Chalcedon as valid.
5. This proves again ... that all of the "orthodox" are in a heretic state ... that sends their immortal souls into Hell outside of the Catholic Church (which has no buildings at this time).
First Council of Nicaea, Profession of Faith, Article 2, 325 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"But those who by the grace of God and by our prayers have not been detected in any schism, and are spotless in the Catholic and Apostolic Church, are to have authority to appoint and to put forward the names of men of the clergy who are worthy, and in general to do everything according to the law and rule of the Church."
Identifying the "orthodox" fraud ... in saying that they accept the First Council of Nicaea ...
1. The "orthodox" claim they accept the First Council of Nicaea ... as being Divinely inspired.
2. The First Council of Nicaea in the above extract ... defines that it is the Catholic and Apostolic Church ... that people separate from when they go into schism.
3. This is a very important extract regarding the "orthodox" ... because the "orthodox" claim that ... it was the Catholic Church that went into schism in 1054 A.D.
4. Since the "orthodox" say they accept the First Council of Nicaea ... and this Council says that the schismatics are those that separate from the Catholic Church ... that would be the "orthodox" ... as was proven in Section 8.6 of this site.
5. This proves again ... that all of the "orthodox" are in a heretic state ... that sends their immortal souls into Hell outside of the Catholic Church (which has no buildings at this time).
Second Council of Nicaea, Canon 4, 787 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"For Peter also, the spokesman of the Apostles, urges: Be pastors to the flock of God entrusted to you, not under compulsion, but willingly as pleasing to God, not for sordid gain but with enthusiasm, not as men who lord it over those entrusted to you, but as being models for the flock."
Identifying the "orthodox" fraud ... in saying that they accept the Second Council of Nicaea ...
1. The "orthodox" claim they accept the Second Council of Nicaea ... as being Divinely inspired.
2. The Second Council of Nicaea in the above extract ... defines that Peter is the spokesman of the Apostles ... the successors of the Apostolic See of Peter (Rome), are the Popes. There is only one Apostolic succession, through Saint Peter, as this protects unity of faith, jurisdiction, and governance.
3. God never changes ... He did establish the Office of the Papacy (currently vacant, see Sections 12 and 13).
4. The "orthodox" say they accept the Second Council of Nicaea ... but this Council says that Saint Peter is the spokesman of the Apostles, mirroring what Christ said in Saint Matthew 16:18 (about building His Church on Saint Peter) ... but the "orthodox" have been rejecting this part of the Second Council of Nicaea since 1054 A.D.
5. This proves again ... that all of the "orthodox" are in a heretic state ... that sends their immortal souls into Hell outside of the Catholic Church (which has no buildings at this time).
Second Council of Nicaea, Definition section, 787 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Given ... the God-spoken teaching of our holy fathers and the tradition of the Catholic Church - for we recognize that this tradition comes from the Holy Spirit who dwells in her."
Identifying the "orthodox" fraud ... in saying that they accept the Second Council of Nicaea ...
1. The "orthodox" claim they accept the Second Council of Nicaea ... as being Divinely inspired.
2. The Second Council of Nicaea in the above extract ... defines that the Holy Spirit dwells in the Catholic Church.
3. God never changes ... He did establish the Catholic Church and guides her into all truth. All other groups are heresies, founded by men, including the "orthodox". The "orthodox" became a man-made group when they went into schism in 1054 A.D.
4. The "orthodox" are rejecting the teaching that the Holy Spirit dwells in the Catholic Church ... that "they say" they should be defending ... by accepting the Second Council of Nicaea as valid.
5. This proves again ... that all of the "orthodox" are in a heretic state ... that sends their immortal souls into Hell outside of the Catholic Church (which has no buildings at this time).
Council of Chalcedon, Session 19, Canon 29, Pope Leo, 451 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"The most reverend Bishops Paschasinus and Lucentius and the priest Bonifatius, representatives of the Apostolic See of Rome, replied: It is sacrilege to reduce a bishop to the rank of priest. But if whatever cause there is for removing those persons from the exercise of episcopacy is just, they ought not to occupy the position even of a priest."
Identifying the "orthodox" fraud ... in saying that they accept the Council of Chalcedon ...
1. The "orthodox" claim they accept the Council of Chalcedon ... as being Divinely inspired.
2. The Council of Chalcedon in the above extract ... defines that the Apostolic See is that of Rome.
3. God never changes ... Apostolic succession runs through the Apostle Peter only ... so that there is unity of Faith. Of course there were other Apostles but apostolic succession does not run through them, since Christ said He will build the Church on Saint Peter.
4. The "orthodox" are rejecting the above teaching that Rome is the Apostolic See ... but, they should be defending this fact ... since the "orthodox" accept the Council of Chalcedon as valid.
5. This proves again ... that all of the "orthodox" are in a heretic state ... that sends their immortal souls into Hell outside of the Catholic Church (which has no buildings at this time).
Second Council of Constantinople, Three Chapters section, 553 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Furthermore, we condemn and anathematize, along with all other heretics who have been condemned and anathematized by the same four Holy Councils and by the Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church."
Identifying the "orthodox" fraud ... in saying that they accept the Second Council of Constantinople ...
1. The "orthodox" claim they accept the Second Council of Constantinople ... as being Divinely inspired.
2. The Second Council of Constantinople in the above extract ... defines the Catholic Church as the Apostolic Church.
3. God never changes ... Apostolic succession runs through the Catholic and Apostolic Church ... so that there is unity of Faith. Of course there were other Apostles but apostolic succession does not run through them, since Christ said He will build the Church on Saint Peter.
4. The "orthodox" are rejecting the above teaching that the Catholic Church is the Apostolic Church ... and they should be defending this fact ... since the "orthodox" accept the Second Council of Constantinople as valid.
5. This proves again ... that all of the "orthodox" are in a heretic state ... that sends their immortal souls into Hell outside of the Catholic Church (which has no buildings at this time).
First Council of Constantinople, Canon 7, 381 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Those who embrace orthodoxy and join the number of those who are being saved from the heretics, we receive ... when they hand in statements and anathematise every heresy which is not of the same mind as the Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church of God."
Identifying the "orthodox" fraud ... in saying that they accept the First Council of Constantinople ...
1. The "orthodox" claim they accept the First Council of Constantinople ... as being Divinely inspired.
2. The First Council of Constantinople in the above extract ... defines the Catholic Church as the Apostolic Church of God.
3. God never changes ... Apostolic succession runs through the Catholic and Apostolic Church ... so that there is unity of Faith. Of course there were other Apostles but apostolic succession does not run through them, since Christ said He will build the Church on Saint Peter.
4. The "orthodox" are rejecting the above teaching that the Catholic Church is the Apostolic Church of God ... and they should be defending this fact ... since the "orthodox" accept the First Council of Constantinople as valid.
5. This proves again ... that all of the "orthodox" are in a heretic state ... that sends their immortal souls into Hell outside of the Catholic Church (which has no buildings at this time).
Note: This Dogma on Abjuration of heresy ... is the manner by which the "orthodox" would become Christian if they want to (by entering the Catholic Church which has no buildings at this time). This is fully covered on Section 19.1 of this site.
First Council of Nicaea, Profession of Faith, Article 2, 325 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"And those who say ... that the Son of God is subject to change or alteration these the Catholic and Apostolic Church anathematises."
Identifying the "orthodox" fraud ... in saying that they accept the First Council of Nicaea ...
1. The "orthodox" claim they accept the First Council of Nicaea ... as being Divinely inspired.
2. The First Council of Nicaea in the above extract ... defines the Catholic Church as the Apostolic Church.
3. God never changes ... Apostolic succession runs through the Catholic and Apostolic Church ... so that there is unity of Faith. Of course there were other Apostles but apostolic succession does not run through them, since Christ said He will build the Church on Saint Peter.
4. The "orthodox" are rejecting the above teaching that the Catholic Church is the Apostolic Church ... and they should be defending this fact ... since the "orthodox" accept the First Council of Nicaea as valid.
5. This proves again ... that all of the "orthodox" are in a heretic state ... that sends their immortal souls into Hell outside of the Catholic Church (which has no buildings at this time).
First Council of Constantinople, Expositions of the 150 Fathers, 381 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"We believe in one God the Father all-powerful, Maker of Heaven and of earth (...) in One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church."
Identifying the "orthodox" fraud ... in saying that they accept the First Council of Constantinople ...
1. The "orthodox" claim they accept the First Council of Constantinople ... as being Divinely inspired.
2. The First Council of Constantinople in the above extract ... defines the Catholic Church as the Apostolic Church.
3. God never changes ... Apostolic succession runs through the Catholic and Apostolic Church ... so that there is unity of Faith. Of course there were other Apostles but apostolic succession does not run through them, since Christ said He will build the Church on Saint Peter.
4. The "orthodox" are rejecting the above teaching that the Catholic Church is the Apostolic Church ... and they should be defending this fact ... since the "orthodox" accept the First Council of Constantinople as valid.
5. This proves again ... that all of the "orthodox" are in a heretic state ... that sends their immortal souls into Hell outside of the Catholic Church (which has no buildings at this time).
Second Council of Nicaea, Definition section, 787 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"To this gracious offer some people paid no attention, being hoodwinked by the treacherous foe they abandoned the true line of reasoning, and setting themselves against the Tradition of the Catholic Church they faltered in their grasp of the truth."
Identifying the "orthodox" fraud ... in saying that they accept the Second Council of Nicae ...
1. The "orthodox" claim they accept the Second Council of Nicaea ... as being Divinely inspired.
2. The Second Council of Nicaea in the above extract ... defines the Catholic Church as that entity which people reject ... who falter in their grasp of the truth.
3. God never changes ... those who faltered in their grasp of the truth ... are against the Catholic Sources of Dogma.
4. The "orthodox" are rejecting the above teaching that one falters regarding the truth ... when they reject the Catholic Church ... but they should be defending this fact ... since the "orthodox" accept the Second Council of Nicaea as valid.
5. This proves again ... that all of the "orthodox" are in a heretic state ... that sends their immortal souls into Hell outside of the Catholic Church (which has no buildings at this time).
Second Council of Constantinople, Three Chapters section, 553 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"We confessed that we held to be condemned and anathematized all those who had been previously condemned and anathematized by the Catholic Church and by the aforesaid four Councils."
Identifying the "orthodox" fraud ... in saying that they accept the Second Council of Constantinople ...
1. The "orthodox" claim they accept the Second Council of Constantinople ... as being Divinely inspired.
2. The Second Council of Constantinople in the above extract ... defines the Catholic Church as that entity which has the authority to condemn and anathematize.
3. God never changes ... the Catholic Church is still that entity that has the authority to condemn and anathematized ... since it was founded by Christ in 33 A.D.
4. The "orthodox" are rejecting the above teaching that the Catholic Church has the authority to condemn and anathematize ... but they should be defending this Catholic authority ... since the "orthodox" accept the Second Council of Constantinople as valid.
5. This proves again ... that all of the "orthodox" are in a heretic state ... that sends their immortal souls into Hell outside of the Catholic Church (which has no buildings at this time).
Summary
1. The "orthodox" heretics left Christianity in 1054 A.D. - - the vatican-2 heretics left Christianity in 1965 (including the vatican-2 eastern Rites (Byzantine, Ukranian, etc.).
2. Please see the Catholic Sources of Dogma on Section 13.6 of this site ... which define that the Catholic God has taken the Mass away in these times. Section 13.6 also identifies how to be in the Catholic Church (which has no buildings at this time).
3. To enter Christianity after being mixed up in any non-Christian (heretic) group ... please make one of the Formal Abjurations of heresy on Section 19.1 of this site ... and proceed to Section 10.2 to make a General Confession of sins (after entering the Catholic Church by Abjuring) since none of your "confessions" since 1965 are valid and there is no forgiveness of sins outside of the Catholic Church.
~ ~ ~ ~
<<< --- <<< --- <<<
--- <<< --- End Section 8.6.1 --- >>> ---
>>> --- >>> --- >>>
Immaculate Heart of Mary ~ Our Lady of Good Remedy ~ Our Lady of La Salette ~
Immaculate Heart of Mary