~         ~         ~

1.  By Catholic definition, the entire public supernatural revelation of the Catholic Faith ended with the death of the last Apostle, Catholic Saint John.

2.  The Pope only has the charism of infallibility when promulgating Sources of Dogma related to Catholic Faith and Morals ... the revelation of which ended with the death of Saint John. In other words, the subject of an infallible decree on Faith or Morals would have to be a subject revealed before the death of the last Apostle.

3.  The sanctity and works of charity of someone who lived in the 12th century is not a subject of Divine revelation before the death of the last Apostle.

4.  The sanctity and works of charity of someone who lived in the 14th century is not a subject of Divine revelation before the death of the last Apostle.

Note 1: The supernatural revelation on faith and morals ... is that which was received by the Apostles, before the death of the last Apostle (Catholic Saint John) in 99 A.D.

Note 2: Supernatural revelation subjects (the subjects of infallible definitions) ... do not and cannot include ... the faith and sanctity of individual persons ... in later centuries.

Note 1: The revelation provided by the Holy Spirit ... is that which was received by the Apostles, before the death of the last Apostle (Catholic Saint John) in 99 A.D.

Note 2: Saying that "Canonizations are infallible" ... "is making known a new doctrine" ... that a particular person is infallibly defined as being in Heaven.  This would be something which was not revealed by the Holy Spirit to the Apostles before 99 A.D.

Note 1: Infallibility applies to subjects on ... faith and morals ... as this citation says twice.

Note 2: The subject of Canonizations are the faith and sanctity of ... individual persons ... which is not an issue of faith definition or morals definition.

Note 3: Saying that "Canonizations are infallible" ... "is making known a new doctrine" ... that a particular person is infallibly defined as being in Heaven.  This would be something which was not revealed by the Holy Spirit to the Apostles before 99 A.D.

Pope Pius X, Syllabus Condemning the Errors of the Modernists (Lamentabili Sane), 3 July 1907, Article 21 >
"Revelation, constituting the object of the Catholic faith, was not completed with the Apostles."   (Condemned as error)

Summary:

Papal Canonizations (which started in the 9th or 10th century) cannot fall under the umbrella of infallibility because the Canonizations do not address subjects covered in the Divine revelation period ... which ended in 99 A.D.

Since Canonizations are not in the realm of ... faith and morals ... they are not infallible.

The subject of Canonizations are the sanctity of persons, so they cannot be considered infallible.

~         ~         ~

Popes can only teach infallibly on matters of Faith and Morals, they cannot teach infallibly regarding the sanctity of persons. This was defined at the Vatican Council of 1870 as follows:

Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 4, On the infallible teaching authority of the Roman Pontiff, 18 July 1870, Paragraph 6 >
"We teach and define as a divinely revealed dogma that when the Roman Pontiff speaks Ex-Cathedra, that is, when,
        1. In the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians,
        2. In virtue of his supreme Apostolic authority,
        3. He defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church,
He possesses, by the divine assistance promised to him in blessed Peter, that infallibility which the divine Redeemer willed his Church to enjoy in defining doctrine concerning faith or morals. Therefore, such definitions of the Roman Pontiff are of themselves, and not by the consent of the Church, irreformable."

Summary:

This dogmatic citation states the Pope has the charism of infallibility (under the conditions of this decree) when teaching on Faith and Morals, not on the subject of the final destination of men's souls.

~         ~         ~

Catholic right reason on this subject:

Before the 9th or 10th century local Bishops would grant that certain persons such as martyrs and confessors could be given public ecclesiastical honor; such honor, however took place in the local territory over which the grantors held jurisdiction.

There is dispute as to when the first canonization occurred that was granted by a Pope. Some say it was Leo III’s canonization of Saint Swibert in 804; others say the canonization of Saint Udalrio by John XV. in 993 A.D.

Setting aside for a moment that canonizations are not infallible ... one cannot say that those who were designated as Saints prior to the 9th or 10th century are infallibly in Heaven since the local Bishops who made these decrees do not have the charism of infallibility, only the Pope does (but not on canonizations).

Those who were designated as Saints prior to the 9th or 10th century are designated as "Pre-Congregation".

Based on this peripheral aspect of this subject, one must come to the conclusion that ... canonizations are not infallible decrees of the Church.

~         ~         ~

The list of the De Fide Dogma of the Catholic Church is on Section 3 of this website. Canonizations are not addressed in a Dogmatic manner by the Solemn Magisterium ... however, the Solemn Magisterium has dogmatically stated that it is permissible and profitable to venerate those who have been designated as Saints, their relics, and their images.
 
Search of the writings of the worldwide Catholic Councils (in an ms-word document), on the word canonization:

The word "canonizations" appears only one time in the writings of the Catholic worldwide Councils it is discussed in the Council of Florence as follows:

Council of Florence, Session 23, 26 March 1436 >
"Since the cardinals of the holy Roman Church are considered to be part of the body of the Roman Pontiff, it is extremely expedient for the common good that, following ancient custom, serious and difficult questions should hereafter be settled on their advice and direction after mature deliberation, especially the following: decisions on matters of faith; canonizations of saints ... laws and constitutions ... foundations of new religious orders ..."

The context of this extract which mentions "canonizations of saints" is simply that Popes should have advice and deliberation from other bishops on various matters and that canonizations is one of these matters ... in line with the above Dogma ... there is no text about canonizations being infallible.

Our search of the Council texts shows that there is no Canon, Decree, or other teaching in any Council that states that canonizations are infallible.

If infallible canonizations was a teaching of the Catholic Church ... it most certainly would have to have shown up in this search.
 
Search of the entire Denzinger Sources of Catholic Dogma (in an ms-word document), on the word canonization:

There is one instance of the word "canonization" (in Article 342) of the Denzinger. This is a decree regarding the veneration of Saint Udalrich, a Bishop.

There are no articles in the Denzinger Sources of Catholic Dogma that say that canonizations are infallible ... this subject is not even addressed.

If infallible canonizations was a teaching of the Catholic Church ... it most certainly would have to have shown up in this search.

~ ~ ~ ~

<<< --- <<< --- <<< --- <<< ---  End Section 104  --- >>> --- >>> --- >>> --- >>>

Immaculate Heart of Mary    ~     Our Lady of Good Remedy    ~     Our Lady of La Salette    ~     Immaculate Heart of Mary