1.  In stages, and through some research, we became aware that ... the "vatican-2 council" was not in any way a Catholic Council since there are well over 200 heresies in the "vatican-2 council" documents. Fifty of these heresies, with Catholic corrections, are shown in Section 12 of this website. It is clear as the noonday sun that another heretic cult was founded ... this time, right at the Vatican in 1965.

2.  Also, in stages we became aware of the heresies of the persons whom we thought were the hierarchy of the Catholic Church.

3.  We then realized that a person holding to or promoting a single heresy against any Catholic Dogma is not in the Catholic Church. The leaders of the vatican-2 heretic cult: Jorge Bergoglio (a.k.a. "Francis"), Karol Wojtyla (a.k.a. "John Paul II"), Joseph Ratzinger (a.k.a. "Benedict XVI") and the others ("John XXIII", "Paul VI", "John Paul I") could not possibly be Catholic bishops because they held and promoted countless heresies ... against the Catholic Dogmas.

4.  In this process we finally came to the proper conclusion that since all of the buildings with Catholic signs out front subscribe to the "vatican-2 council" they cannot possibly be Catholic Churches. In reality these formerly Catholic buildings are now nothing more than meeting halls for the vatican-2 jew-heretic cult. Catholic Jurisdiction for Mass and all other sacraments (except Water Baptism) disappeared from the face of the earth on 8 December 1965 (proven on Section 13.6).

5.  Upon reading the "encyclicals" of anti-Popes "Benedict XV", "Pius XI", and "Pius XII" we discovered many heresies in their writings. These three non-Catholic apostates set up the "vatican-2 council" of apostasy (1962-1965).

6.  We also have realized that the "independents" are all in heresy against the Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance. These groups include the hoaxes called the "sspx", "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", and all other "independents" -- they all employ the non-Catholic fraud of "supplied jurisdiction" (proven as heresy on Section 99).

7.  Through a little research we saw that associating the words "jew", "jews" and "judaism" ... with the Old Testament Israelites was an error, and (as we all know) a highly prevalent one.

8.  In summary, we didn't have any error related to stating the Catholic Dogma on various subjects, but there was error in applying the Dogma to persons and institutions.

Based on the above Introduction ... Previous errors on this website were:

~         ~         ~

1.  We were in error by stating that the vatican-2 jew-heretic cult founded in 1965 at the Vatican is the Catholic Church, it clearly is not. (See Section 12, 13.2)

2.  We were in error by stating that "Benedict XVI" is a Catholic bishop and Pope, he isn't. (See Sections 12, 12.6, 13, 13.1, 13.2)

2a.  We were in error by using the term "anti-Pope" in association with "Benedict XVI". He cannot be referred to as an "anti-Pope" because this would infer that he was a false claimant to the Papacy. Since the Vatican-2 cult is not the Catholic Church it doesn't have the office of the Papacy ... so the word "anti-Pope" doesn't apply to "Benedict XVI" ... he is simply the group leader for the Vatican-2 jew-heretic cult.

3.  We were in error by stating that "John Paul II" was a Catholic bishop and Pope, he wasn't. (See Sections 12, 12.7, 13, 13.1, 13.2)

3a.  We were in error by using the term "anti-Pope" in association with "John Paul II". He cannot be referred to as an "anti-Pope" because this would infer that he was a false claimant to the Papacy. Since the Vatican-2 cult is not the Catholic Church the word "anti-Pope" wouldn't apply to "John Paul II", he is simply a group leader for a heretic cult.

4.  We were in error by stating that "John Paul I" was a Catholic bishop and Pope, he wasn't. (See Sections 12, 13.2)

4a.  We were in error by using the term "anti-Pope" in association with "John Paul I". He cannot be referred to as an "anti-Pope" because this would infer that he was a false claimant to the Papacy. Since the vatican-2 cult is not the Catholic Church the word "anti-Pope" wouldn't apply to "John Paul I", he is simply a group leader for a heretic cult.

5.  We were in error by stating that "Paul VI" was a Catholic bishop and Pope, he wasn't. (See Sections 12, 12.8, 13, 13.1, 13.2)

5a.  We were in error by using the term "anti-Pope" in association with "Paul VI" after 8 December 1965. After 8 December 1965 "Paul VI" cannot be referred to as an "anti-Pope" because this would infer that he was a false claimant to the Papacy. Since the vatican-2 cult is not the Catholic Church the word "anti-Pope", after 8 December 1965, wouldn't apply to "Paul VI", he is simply a group leader for a heretic cult. Prior to 8 December 1965 "Paul VI" can be referred to as an anti-Pope since the vatican-2 jew-heretic cult had not yet been founded at the Vatican.

6.  We were in error by stating that "John XXIII" was a Catholic bishop and Pope, he wasn't. (See Sections 12.9, 13.2)

7.  We were in error by stating that "Pius XII" was a Catholic bishop and Pope, he wasn't. (See Section 20.2, 20.3, 13.2)

8.  We were in error by stating that "Pius XI" was a Catholic bishop and Pope, he wasn't. (See Section 20.1, 20.3, 13.2)

9.  We were in error by stating that "Benedict XV" was a Catholic bishop and Pope, he wasn't. (See Section 20, 20.3, 13.2)

10.  Since an automatically excommunicated heretic cannot make Catholic Saints, those who were subject to what looked like canonizations by "Benedict XV", "Pius XI", and "Pius XII" cannot be referred to as Saints. Actions by these anti-Popes concerning Louis Marie de Montfort, John Marie Vianny, Robert Bellarmine, and others cannot be regarded as elevations to Sainthood. The same issue regarding "Beatifications" and naming people "Venerable" applies to these three heretics ... where it looked like people were being made Blessed or Venerable of the Church but they were not.

11.  We were in error by stating that "Cardindal Thuc" was a Catholic bishop after the "vatican-2 council" he wasn't. (See Sections 12, 13.2, 87)

12.  We were in error stating that the un-baptized pagans who call themselves "jews" and who use the brand name of "judaism" for their particular apostasy were related to or had something to do with the Old Testament Israelites. The religion of the Old Testament Israelites was the Catholic Faith unfulfilled. The pagan apostasy which people call "judaism" started in about 200 B.C. when a group of people left God's covenant with the Israelites and started "talmudic judaism" adopting pagan Babylonian fables which they carried out of the Babylonian captivity. (See Sections 39.1 (primary), 39, 55, 56, 78)

13.  We had references to the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima in Portugal in 1917. This apparition has a serious attack against the Dogma in that the text of this apparition states that: "most souls go to Hell for sins against the flesh". This is clearly false since it is undeniable that most souls fall into Hell for sins against the Faith ... heresy and apostasy. Also, the "sins against the flesh" statement could very well make heretics and un-baptized pagans think that they may be getting to Heaven if they are not in sins against the body (which would truely be a rarity among heretics and pagans). It is also problematic that Our Lady of Fatima occurred under the "reign" of anti-Pope "Benedict XV" so that corruption associated with this apparition would not be opposed and was probably encouraged. (See Sections 1, 2, 3, 5, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 8, 22, 39)

13 a.  One of the Fatima prayers reads: "My God, I believe, I adore, I hope, and I love Thee; And I beg pardon for those who do not believe, do not adore, do not hope, and do not love Thee." This statement is clearly heresy in that anyone who dies as a heretic ("lutheran", "methodist", "baptist", pentacostal", etc.) or pagan ("jew", "mohammaden", "hindu", "buddhist", etc.) will not receive "pardon for not believing" but will descend into Hell a moment after they take their last breath. Asking pardon for the non-believing (heretics and un-baptized pagans) leaves the impression that there is currently or will be a pardon for not believing, which is opposed to the Catholic Dogma on Section 5.1 of this site. (See Sections 1, 2, 3, 5, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 8, 22, 39)

14.  We had a section on the website about Padre Pio. We removed this section because Padre Pio's physical participation in the vatican-2 heretic cult caused him to be automaticaly excommunicated from the Catholic Church on 8 December 1965. Section 17.4 of this site identifies the fact ... that for Padre Pio to have died inside the Catholic Church, he would of had to Abjure his participation in the vatican-2 cult ... after his last public act in the vatican-2 heresy and before he died. The people in the vatican-2 cult might say to themselves: "Padre Pio was vatican-2 so I guess it's okay to be a physical and formal representative of the vatican-2 heresy." Taking this position sends you into Hell for participation in a heretical society. (See Sections 12 and 13)

15.  I had referred to "Faith, Hope, and Charity" as the Cardinal Virtues when they are the Theological Virtues. (See Section 100)

16.  In Section 7.3, I had an incorrect translation for the Latin word "aut" from an extract of the Council of Trent, Session 6, Chapter 4 which led to a short analysis which was false. This has been removed and at the same time Section 7.3 has been significantly upgraded.

17.  In Section 68 under the Section for Corporal works of mercy I had text that stated that the works of mercy listed in Saint Matthew 25:31-46 were the caused of salvation (in doing these works) or damnation (in omitting them). I must not have checked this short Section before uploading it. Works of charity while outside of the Catholic Church do not get you to Heaven. To get to Heaven you must be in the justified state which is by water baptism and believing the entire Catholic Faith. There is no possibility that a heretic or an un-baptized pagan can be in a justified state since heresy and paganism are sins against the First Commandment. If someone does charity while outside of the Catholic Church and then subsequently enters the Church, then that charity done while outside is merited to the soul.

18.  On the Confession guide, Section 10.1, Third Commandment, 7th sin ... I had:
"You can still keep the fasting and abstinence requirements of the Church by following the notations for this on a Traditional Catholic calendar ..."

When it should have read:
"You must still keep the fasting and abstinence requirements ..."

19.  In Section 7 on Baptism I had text which read:
"Simply follow the above instructions and perform the baptisms yourself, after you have learned and believe the Catholic Dogma and Sources of Dogma."

It has been corrected to:
"Simply follow the above instructions and perform the baptisms yourself (on infants) ... and on post age of reason persons after they have learned and believe the Catholic Dogma and Sources of Dogma."

The initial text could have made someone think that they can baptize themselves ... which you cannot do.

20.  In Section 7 on Baptism I had text which read:
"The non-Catholic vatican-2 meeting halls will not teach you the Catholic Dogma in preparation for baptism because that is not their "religion" (see Section 12)."

It has been corrected to:
As an adult ... you cannot be baptized into a heresy, the baptism will not be valid. Post age of reason (7 years) you must believe the Catholic Dogma at the moment of baptism for the baptism to be valid. The non-Catholic vatican-2 cult meeting halls cannot bring you into the Catholic Church since they all promote heresy against the Catholic Dogma and are the buildings of a heretic cult. This cult (which you must stay out of, see Section 13.2.2) will obviously not teach you the Catholic Dogma ... so that "baptism" will not be valid.

21.  In Section 19.1, the Abjuration Section -- Item 49 in the Reject section read:

I reject and condemn:  the heresy which states that > "Christ Jesus was given of God to men, as a Redeemer in Whom to trust, and not also as a Legislator in whom to obey." To obey Christ is to believe the Catholic Dogma. (Council of Trent, Sixth Session, Chapter 16, On Justification, Canon 21)

When it should have read for better clarity:
I reject and condemn:  any heresy which denies that > "Christ Jesus was given of God to men, as a Redeemer in Whom to trust, and not also as a Legislator in whom to obey." To obey Christ is to believe the Catholic Dogma. (Council of Trent, Sixth Session, Chapter 16, On Justification, Canon 21)

22.  In Section 19.1, the Abjuration Section -- Item 51 in the Reject section read:

I reject and condemn:  the heresy which states > "In proscribing errors, the Church cannot demand internal assent from the faithful by which the judgments she issues are to be embraced." I believe the Catholic dogma which teaches that the Church can demand that the faithful must believe in their minds and hearts what they profess with their lips. (Pope Pius X, Lamentabili Sane, 3 July 1907, Article 7)

When it should have read for better clarity:
I reject and condemn:  any heresy which denies > "In proscribing errors, the Church cannot demand internal assent from the faithful by which the judgments she issues are to be embraced." I believe the Catholic dogma which teaches that the Church can demand that the faithful must believe in their minds and hearts what they profess with their lips. (Pope Pius X, Lamentabili Sane, 3 July 1907, Article 7)

23.  In Section 3.1, I had text which had read:

"The Solemn Magisterium Dogma is listed in Section 3 of this website."

when it should have read:

"The Catholic De Fide Dogma which categorizes the Faith is listed in Section 3 of this website."

24.  I had text stating that the Douay-Rheims Bible was compiled in Douay, England and Rheims, France ... but the DRB was compiled at the English Catholic College in Douay, France and at Rheims, France.

25.  In Section 105.3, I had text which had read:

("Benedict XV") ... "Stating that heretics and pagans are not excluded from the redemption"

when it should have read:

("Benedict XV") ... "Stating that heretics and pagans are not excluded from the benefit of the Redemption (Salvation)."

Note: Heretics and un-baptized pagans are not excluded from the redemption but they must apply the Redemption to their souls in the one way prescribed by the Catholic God ... water baptism and believing the Catholic Faith whole and inviolate. This would apply the benefit of the Redemption (Salvation, getting to Heaven) to their souls if they do not fall into grave sin and if they do sufficient works to merit Heaven.

26.  On Section 21 I had a reference to Fr. Feeney ... in terms of him being persecuted for defending the Salvation Dogma and the Dogma that you have to Baptized in water to get to Heaven by heretics at the Vatican, and the heretics running his (by then non-Catholic) "Jesuit Order". Apparently Fr. Feeney had writings that your soul can reach the state of Justification without water baptism but cannot get to Heaven without water baptism.

One cannot reach the state of Justification without the Sanctifying Grace of water baptism. Men cannot, of their own merit (or will), progress to a sanctified state of soul (that is, remit Original Sin) ... see Section 7.2 of this site for infallible Sources of Dogma on this point.

Perhaps this heresy was in the published work by treachery ... if not we hope that Fr. Feeney repented of this heresy on Justification.

27.  In Section 72, I had text which had read:

Those "independents" which may have a valid Mass are all in heresy against the Catholic Jurisdiction and Governance Dogma listed in Section 87 of this website. Stay out of these heretic assemblies of the "sspx", "sspv", "Thuc line" meeting halls, "cmri", and other independents ... they send you into Hell"

When it should have read:

There are many "independents" who look like they are conducting Catholic Mass but are not, first of all they have zero ordained priests ... they are all in heresy against the Jurisdiction Dogma listed on Section 87 of this site (the vatican-2 cult likewise has no Catholic Jurisdiction because they are not Catholic in Faith). "Independents" such as the ... "sspx", "sspv", "cmri", claim to have Catholic priests ... but the heretics (who are dressed like priests) were not ordained because all the bishops of the world were automatically excommunicated for approving the heresy in the "vatican-2 council" documents. Marcel Lefebvre ("sspx"), Ngo Dinh Thuc ("cmri") and the others ceased being Catholic bishops on 8 December 1965, so they were incapable of ordaining Catholic priests after this date.

28.  On Section 19.1 (and repeated on Section 92) ... corrected information on the witnessing of Abjurations. The Catholic citations state that in the past one would hand in their Abjuration, and also possibly have his Abjuration witnessed by others. There are no priests or bishops to hand in Abjurations to, and none to witness your Abjuration.

But if one accepts the Catholic Dogma, Abjures of his heresy, Abjures his participation in a heretic cult, and anathematizes the leaders of his heretic cult ... and if properly baptized in water he is back in the Catholic Church after Abjuring and making the Profession of Faith (regardless of the fact he may not have witnesses).

29.  On Section 87 in the Conclusion, Number 8, I had text which read ...

"Those who dispense and receive what are possibly valid (but illegal) sacraments in independent meeting halls ("SSPX", "SSPV", "CMRI", "Thuc line", etc.) are acting against ..."

has been corrected to read ...

Added: New Number 8 >
The "sspx" doesn't have any priests (and so do not have Catholic Masses) since Lefebvre was automatically excommunicated for heresy on 8 December 1965 for approving the heresy packed "vatican-2 council" documents (and for staying on as a group leader for the vatican-2 heretic cult). Since Lefebvre was excommunicated he didn't have the sacramental power to Ordain priests or Consecrate bishops after he started the "sspx" in 1970. For this same reason the "sspv" doesn't have any priests since the "sspv" heretics (who are dressed like priests) started in the "sspx" under Lefebvre. The "sspx" and "sspv" are simply putting on Catholic looking stage shows which send you into Hell.

Added: Number 9 >
The "cmri" and other "Thuc line" groups do not have any priests (and so do not Catholic Masses) since Thuc was automatically excommunicated on 8 December 1965 for approving the heresy packed "vatican-2 council documents (and for staying on as a group leader for the vatican-2 heretic cult). Thuc did not have the sacramental power to ordain or consecrate anyone after 8 December 1965, so there is no valid Mass in the "cmri" or other "Thuc line" meeting halls ... they're simply putting on Catholic looking stage shows which sends you into Hell.

30.  On Section 2 ... I had a citation from a local (non-Dogmatic) Council of Carthage XII (419 A.D.) which stated that heretic "donatists" are joined to the Catholic Church, by just the "imposition of hands". This is heresy, a post age of reason person (7 years) cannot be baptized into a heretic cult and have the "baptism" be valid since the Holy Spirit cannot honor baptism into a heretic cult (the person remains in the state of Original Sin).

A post age of reason person (7 years) who looked like he was being "baptized" into at a heretic cult meeting hall ... must first know and believe the Catholic Dogma and then undergo a conditional re-baptism to enter the Catholic Church.

31.  I wrongly identified Marcel Lefebvre as a Catholic Bishop. Lefebvre was not ordained a priest by Achille Lienart on 21 September 1929, which of course also means Lienart did not make Lefebvre a Bishop in 1947. Please see Section 105, Sub-part E-1.

32.  I wrongly identified Ngo Dinh Thuc as a Catholic Bishop. Thuc was not consecrated a Bishop by Antonio Drapier on 4 May 1938. Please see Section 131, Sub-part A-1.

33.  I had on the site ... that Divine intervention would be required to re-establish the Papacy and the priesthood. Such Divine intervention (of re-establishing the priesthood) is not going to happen because ... (1) Divine public revelation ended in 99 A.D. with the death of Saint John and (2) the Dogma states that when Christ returns it will only be for the judgement ... not for re-establishing the priesthood.

34.  I wrongly identified August 15 as a Holy Day of Obligation on Section 147. August 15 was not designated a Holy Day ... by heretic "Pius XII" who did not have Catholic Jurisdiction to define the Assumption since "Pius XII" was automatically excommunicated for heresy, see Section 20.2 of this site. Section 4.4 of this site ... lists many Catholic authored scriptures that the Blessed Virgin is body and soul in Heaven.

35.  On Section 21.1 ... I mistakenly stated that "independent chapels" and the "sspx" hoax have valid Mass. I stopped going to the invalid Masses in January 2009 ... none of those dressed like priests around the world have been ordained ... because there are no bishops. See Section 13.6.

36.  I had stated that ... that Catholic jurisdiction would be re-established in the world after the 8 December 1965 disappearance of jurisdiction. Catholic jurisdiction, the Papacy, bishops, and priest office will not be re-established ... proven on Sections 13.8 and 13.8.1.

37.  On Section 39.9 ... I had listed what was required for Old Testament persons to be in a righteous state (Sub-parts A and B) ... so that they would go to the Limbo Section of Hell (Limbus Patrum, Limbo of the Fathers) ... instead of the Hell of the damned. I had an ommission in that I didn't provide the scriptures and other citations ... identifying the fact that the Catholic Jesus Christ descended into Hell and instituted water Baptism for the Old Testament righteous ... who were in Limbus Patrum. Water Baptism is required to remit Original Sin ... to have any chance of getting to Heaven.

37a.  The old title of Section 39.9 was wrong in that ... it implied that Old Testament righteous could get to Heaven outside the Catholic Church (they could not) ... they had to be Baptized in water into The Catholic Church. Section 39.9 (before correction) also stated that Old Testament persons could be in the justified state, when none of them could be just ... because they were all in the state of Original Sin, except the Blessed Virgin (see Section 4.4).

~ ~ ~ ~

<<< --- <<< --- <<< --- <<< ---  End Appendix B  --- >>> --- >>> --- >>> --- >>>

Immaculate Heart of Mary    ~     Our Lady of Good Remedy    ~     Our Lady of La Salette    ~     Immaculate Heart of Mary